As I wrote in the wake of the Southport massacre (where three beautiful girls were slain and a further nine seriously injured at the hands of a savage), this was ‘the end of the line’:
“As a fresh, incoming Prime Minister, Keir Starmer now has a golden opportunity to get tough on terrorism and put the country back on track, starting with the above as a bare minimum. He won’t do any of it, of course, which is why civil war is regrettably inevitable.
I don’t mean the civil war ten years down the line; I mean the one that’s been waging for years. It’s just that our leaders have convinced us to look the other way, and only one side has been fighting. There is unrest everywhere you look on the streets of Britain: whether it’s pro-Palestine thuggery or the riots in Leicester and Leeds. The difference is, there is suddenly a palpable sense that the British have had enough.
This weekend’s peaceful “We want our country back” demonstration in Trafalgar Square may just have been the calm before the storm. Let’s hope our politicians break the habit of a lifetime, and start prioritising the safety of the British people. If they do not, things are going to get real ugly very soon.”
Regrettably, Starmer’s response was predictably cruel and petulant; promising a crackdown - not on child murderers of course, but on those who dared speculate on the government’s lack of curiosity. To remind ourselves, this was the furthest Merseyside Police were prepared to go on the nature of the suspect, ‘a 17-year-old boy from the village of Banks’:
“The youth, who cannot be named for legal reasons and is originally from Cardiff, moved to the Southport area with his Rwandan parents when he was aged six.”
As usual, the Old Bill knew nothing worth knowing, except that it definitely wasn’t terrorism related - as Chief Constable Serena Kennedy tried to convince us, whilst working hand-in-hand with counter-terrorism police:
The investigation is in its early stages, and the motivation for the incident remains unclear. However, Counter-Terrorism Police North West have offered their support to Merseyside Police, as the full circumstances of what has happened are being established. At this moment in time, the investigation is not being treated as terrorist related.
Just a regular Taff from the Valleys then, Axel Muganwa Rudakubana. Even for Britain, the stench of cover-up reeked.
Civil unrest was inevitable, but with political protest and disorder very much a feature of the landscape thanks to Black Lives Matter rioters, Pro-Palestine thugs, and middle-class twerps high on the latest eco loonery, you’d have thought the authorities wouldn’t have needed to change out of their kid gloves. Except that they did. Starmer suddenly remembered the New Labour mantra: tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime, and his stormtroopers immediately swung into action; arresting anyone and everyone who failed to stick to the official line, and felt compelled to voice their anger on the streets of Britain.
The pretext was ‘misinformation’. While speculation was rife that Southport was the result of Islamic terrorism, it was claimed Rudabukana was a Christian not a Muslim. Here’s the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, warning us of the dangers of spreading misinformation:
https://x.com/ArchRose90/status/1851314846547026334
Those who dissented or rioted were given remarkably short shrift, often arrested, convicted and jailed within days. Bernie Spofforth was one such high-profile individual, who tweeted the rumours that the suspect was a small boats migrant on the MI5 watchlist, adding: ‘If this is true, then all hell is about to break loose’. Despite deleting the tweet an hour later, Spofforth was arrested and held for 36 hours on the grounds of ‘stirring up racial hatred’ and sending ‘false communications’.
Many ‘rioters’ were arrested and charged, including a 12-year-old boy - the youngest known to ever be convicted of violent disorder in England. Others were given lengthy jail sentences on clearly trumped-up charges, such as ‘shouting at a police dog’, and sending mean tweets. In the worst case, 61-year-old angina and heart attack sufferer, Peter Lynch, was jailed for almost three years for shouting ‘racist and provocative remarks’ towards the police. According to the authorities, Lynch tragically committed suicide in prison just weeks ago.
If you consider these sentences commensurate with the ‘crimes’ and the notion of ‘two-tier policing’ a conspiracy theory, you may wish to reflect that rapists and murderers are routinely being released to free up prison space for these dissenters; you may also recall that the Muslim thugs who attacked police officers at Manchester Airport (including breaking a policewoman’s nose) back in July, are still to be charged.
I give this rather lengthy preamble, because the truth regarding Rudakubana has suddenly emerged, and it should prove nothing short of a tipping point for Britain. On the eve of a devastating Autumn Budget (draw your own conclusions on the timing), it was revealed that Axel was in possession of an Al Qaeda DIY Jihad guide: Military studies in the jihad against the tyrants: The al-Qaeda training manual. Not only that, but he was also producing the deadly poison ricin. I’m no expert on teenage Islamic terrorism, but even a layman might surmise that jihadi journals in lieu of schoolbooks and ricin for a packed lunch, might just get this schoolboy over the threshold. It’s worth noting that Tommy Robinson (the government’s preferred poster boy for extremism), was jailed under the Terrorism act for ‘failing to disclose his mobile PIN number’.
The government claims it became aware of these new terrorism charges in the past few weeks, and if you believe that then I’ve got a bridge to sell you. As to the question of how early the authorities knew about the terrorist nature of Southport, and whether it took them three months to search Rudakubana’s home, former Chief Adviser to Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Dominic Cummings, summed it up rather well:
https://x.com/Dominic2306/status/1851291937531445396
Let’s just take a moment here to catch our breath. It has now been confirmed that our suspicions were right all along. Not only that, but the government knew. They blatantly lied. They forced the public to acquiesce to their lies, and the penalty for failing to comply was severe. The authorities have now confirmed the entire farce as though nothing has happened, straight out of the Covid playbook. In short, they are gaslighting us and laughing in our faces. They controlled the narrative, aided and abetted by the media - who persist to this day in depicting Rudakubana as an angelic primary school choirboy, introverted, shy and unassuming. The reality is he is an evil scumbag, for whom a lifetime in Hell would not assuage his sins.
What’s more unbelievable, is that they are still lying! Even after they know we know that they knew, and they have as good as confirmed the matter, the powers that be insist on dissembling. A Downing Street spokesman for the Prime Minister has argued it was “not correct” to say that the government had been involved in withholding facts from the public (note the passive use of the phrase ‘had been involved in’, rather than an outright denial). The police have stated it is “certainly not the case” that they had been keeping things from the public. The Crown Prosecution Service meanwhile professed it had taken a long time to bring charges, because it was a “lengthy and complex investigation”.
Serena Kennedy, Misinformer-in-Chief for Merseyside Police, has once again astonishingly urged the public to avoid speculation:
“At this time, Counter-Terrorism Policing has not declared the events of July 29 a terrorist incident. I recognise that these new charges may lead to speculation. The matter for which Axel Rudakubana has been charged under the Terrorism Act doesn’t require motive to be established. For a matter to be declared a terrorist incident, motivation would need to be established.”
You’ve got that haven’t you? ‘Even though we’re now prosecuting him under the Terrorism Act for acts of terrorism, don’t you dare think that’s it’s because he’s a terrorist - after all, who among us doesn’t keep Jihad manuals and ricin on the bedside table, for a bit of late night entertainment?’
Leftwing bigotry is one thing, as witnessed in the flat refusal to stop eulogising Chris Kaba even after he has been declared an unmitigated scumbag. It’s quite another thing to impose such bigotry on the public, and imprison those who refuse to take their medicine.
Because nothing makes sense in Britain anymore, it seems reasonable to seek alternative explanations for government policy:
The authorities haven’t a clue what to do about their failed multicultural project. (That much is clear)
The authorities don’t want to do anything about their failed multicultural project, because it conflicts with their ideology. (That much is likely)
The authorities literally don’t care how many of our children die, they will continue their failed multicultural project no matter what. (That much, terrifyingly, may also be true)
In the absence of political honesty, it may be a sensible policy to treat every official denial simply as fact: ‘It’s not terrorism’ / ‘He’s not a Muslim’ / ‘There’s no cover-up’, suddenly make more sense.
Clearly, in the specific case of Southport, there are more immediate questions to answer:
What happens now to those imprisoned for telling the truth?
What (if anything) happens to those directly involved in gaslighting the public?
Is Islam going to continue to get a free pass, or are we going to get answers: who converted / radicalised Rudakubana? Which mosque did this take place in, and at the hands of which Imam?
Perhaps most importantly, why is Islam’s favourite target innocent little white girls? (Perhaps Labour could take the opportunity to finally grapple with some genuine misogyny?)
What plays out now on the streets of Britain is a good question. The government fears unrest, and they are right to do so - given that everyone from the PM, the Home Secretary, the CPS and the Police have as good as admitted their role in the cover-up. The police are on standby, and have been instructed to ensure they have back-up provisions in place. But there is a key difference here: in the wake of Southport we only suspected the truth; now we know it. Extremists notwithstanding, no one wants unrest - but you know what else quells a rebellion? An old-fashioned adherence to honour, duty, and above all, truth. What a shame Westminster’s stores of such commodities were depleted long ago.
Please watch the following clip of Keir Starmer laying flowers at the scene of the crime. You can see the fraud written all over his face: he knew, they all knew. There is a word for this level of deceit, and we used to be confident enough to use it. The fallout from the Rudakubana cover-up is nothing short of treason - which I’d define as the betrayal of one’s country before one’s Monarch. There should be extreme consequences for those engaged in such behaviour, particularly those who use the iron fist of the Law to incarcerate dissenters.
https://x.com/Frankhaviland/status/1851335000442224954
Starmer not only should not survive this scandal, he cannot be allowed to.
Dear reader I do not usually ask, but if you agree with the sentiments above please share this piece: the cover-up of Southport is (I would argue) even more egregious than the Covid scam, and it cannot be allowed to stand. Thank you!
Frank Haviland is the Editor of The New Conservative, and the author of Banalysis: The Lie Destroying the West.
If you enjoy my work, please consider buying me a coffee - it would really help to keep me going. Thank you!
Well said but...nothing will happen, nothing will change. People can rise up like lions but they will simply get clubbed by coppers, beaten by Muslims, get called names and then imprisoned by immoral judges. I am old enough to remember race riots in the 1970s, poll tax riots and miner's riots in the 1980s, anti war protests in the 2000s. I can even remember seeing Enoch Powell interviewed (interesting voice!). Nothing makes any difference. The government just carries on regardless. They hear what is being said but they know it doesn't make any difference. We keep obeying the laws and paying our taxes. Look how well the great humiliation that was Covid went for the government. Most people did exactly what they were told (even people who hate Boris Johnson still hung on his every word). Most people don't protest. They mumble about how dreadful it all is then they obey the law and pay their tax. There has been nothing good to come out of Westminster in at least 60 years but we all still just carry on behaving like they are decent people doing their best to improve things. I reckon the politicians have absolutely no idea how to stop the mass immigration or how to balance the books or fix the NHS. I don't think they have a realistic idea in their tiny heads. But it doesn't matter because, unless we go in for a proper Revolution (very un-British), nothing will change.
A very thoughtful article Frank and if the subject wasn’t so raw I would have enjoyed reading it. I’m not a lawyer but I wonder whether those locked up for tweets and Facebook posts for long sentences despite pleading guilty, would have a case against the useless Merseyside Chief Constable and Starmer himself for withholding information about the alleged perpetrator which they knew and would have probably had a significant impact on their plea and likelihood of conviction? Hopefully a sensible lawyer who believes in the truth could crowdfund for an appeal and claim against Kennedy and Starmer.