I found it instructive, when I moved to Italy, how much Berlusconi was loved. When discussing such issues as bunga-bunga parties, the average Italian view was 'if you could, why wouldn't you?' In the UK you'd have thought he'd ordered the slaughter of the first-born.
Starmer is much worse than just being a sanctimonious (corrupt) bore. He's an empty-eyed fanatic hell-bent on imposing his fellow globalist's insane ideology upon the population of Britain while simultaneously replacing the indigenous population with third world migrants from a culture that wants to take over the country and impose it own religio-political Totalitarian regime. Starmer won't even acknowledge the sexual assaults on girls and women or the murders, which the mainstream media can't even bring itself to report (or is not allowed to by Starmer). He appears to regard these horrors merely as collateral damage, acceptable to him as a price to pay for the success of his nation-free world dystopia. The price is being paid now, by the British people. Starmer's way of ministering to those that voted-in his pre-hijacked Liebour party is by imposing his dehumanised (and dehumanising) dream upon the British people. Orwell saw his like in the future, from that 1884 inception. In 1945 Starmer would have swiftly become intimate with justice, never mind his lawyerly predilection. He would be paid 'the Wages of Sin'. We feel nothing but disdain and horror at what he is. A creature of nightmare.
People all too often mistake virtue for purity. The truth is, to attain virtue, you must see the worst of experiences be among the carnage and crucially have a knowledge that explains or justifies the why of what you are seeing and know how you can affect a positive outcome in any future event of a similar nature. This is what is commonly known as wisdom, not to be conflated with intellect. People can be too clever by half but not wise. The overarching virtue is justice, but justice is relational, and in that it must be centred as justice informed by the norms and values central to the Polis of which one is attached. In Ancient Greece, their most celebrated political leaders all held one trait or characteristic in common: an uncompromising and unwavering loyalty that was to serve only the interests of their people and their people alone.
I must admit, when my wife was dumbfounded at Mandelson being appointed for the American job, I said to her well he’s a right dishonest bastard who I wouldn’t trust trust for a moment, but that’s probably something that might be advantage.
I found it instructive, when I moved to Italy, how much Berlusconi was loved. When discussing such issues as bunga-bunga parties, the average Italian view was 'if you could, why wouldn't you?' In the UK you'd have thought he'd ordered the slaughter of the first-born.
We have the wrong kind of bastard!
Starmer is much worse than just being a sanctimonious (corrupt) bore. He's an empty-eyed fanatic hell-bent on imposing his fellow globalist's insane ideology upon the population of Britain while simultaneously replacing the indigenous population with third world migrants from a culture that wants to take over the country and impose it own religio-political Totalitarian regime. Starmer won't even acknowledge the sexual assaults on girls and women or the murders, which the mainstream media can't even bring itself to report (or is not allowed to by Starmer). He appears to regard these horrors merely as collateral damage, acceptable to him as a price to pay for the success of his nation-free world dystopia. The price is being paid now, by the British people. Starmer's way of ministering to those that voted-in his pre-hijacked Liebour party is by imposing his dehumanised (and dehumanising) dream upon the British people. Orwell saw his like in the future, from that 1884 inception. In 1945 Starmer would have swiftly become intimate with justice, never mind his lawyerly predilection. He would be paid 'the Wages of Sin'. We feel nothing but disdain and horror at what he is. A creature of nightmare.
People all too often mistake virtue for purity. The truth is, to attain virtue, you must see the worst of experiences be among the carnage and crucially have a knowledge that explains or justifies the why of what you are seeing and know how you can affect a positive outcome in any future event of a similar nature. This is what is commonly known as wisdom, not to be conflated with intellect. People can be too clever by half but not wise. The overarching virtue is justice, but justice is relational, and in that it must be centred as justice informed by the norms and values central to the Polis of which one is attached. In Ancient Greece, their most celebrated political leaders all held one trait or characteristic in common: an uncompromising and unwavering loyalty that was to serve only the interests of their people and their people alone.
In my opinion that’s exactly what we need.
I must admit, when my wife was dumbfounded at Mandelson being appointed for the American job, I said to her well he’s a right dishonest bastard who I wouldn’t trust trust for a moment, but that’s probably something that might be advantage.
It’s the hypocrisy, lies and coverups wot gets em in the end. Starmer fails every test his lawyerly background would set.